Skip to content

Technology Trends

Complex AI Agents

Model Mafia

In the world of AI dev, there’s a lot of excitement around multi-agent frameworks—swarms, supervisors, crews, committees, and all the buzzwords that come with them. These systems promise to break down complex tasks into manageable pieces, delegating work to specialized agents that plan, execute, and summarize on your behalf. Picture this: you hand a task to a “supervisor” agent, it spins up a team of smaller agents to tackle subtasks, and then another agent compiles the results into a neat little package. It’s a beautiful vision, almost like a corporate hierarchy with you at the helm. And right now, these architectures and their frameworks are undeniably cool. They’re also solving real problems as benchmarks show that iterative, multi-step workflows can significantly boost performance over single-model approaches.

But these frameworks are a temporary fix, a clever workaround for the limitations of today's AI models. As models get smarter, faster, and more capable, the need for this intricate scaffolding will fade. We're building hammers and hunting for nails, when the truth is that the nail (the problem itself) might not even exist in a year. Let me explain why.

The "Idea Guy" Delusion: Why No One Is Safe from AI

Knowledge Workers As AI continues to evolve, many professionals (especially software developers like myself) are coming to terms with the reality that their jobs will eventually be automated. Maybe in two years, maybe in five. But it’s happening.

Yet, amidst this shift, a certain group seems oddly confident in their immunity to AI-driven disruption: the idea guys.

These are the people who believe that once AI automates programming and other forms of technical labor, the true value will shift to those who can generate great ideas. But I don't buy it. Sure, there's a timeline where this could be true. But in most cases, the idea guy is just as doomed as the software developer, if not more so.